Evaluation criteria

Mid-term evaluation criteria based on school regulations:

§ 26

1. The mid-term evaluation is carried out on the basis of materials submitted by the doctoral student confirming the implementation of the IPB, including a report on the implementation of the IPB, and an interview with the doctoral student. The doctoral student attaches to their report a questionnaire filled in by them on the cooperation with the supervisor.

2. The supervisor, or supervisors, attaches to the doctoral student’s report on the implementation of the IPB the following documents:

1) an opinion on the progress of the doctoral student in the implementation of the IPB;

2) a questionnaire on cooperation with the doctoral student.

3. The Council, in consultation with the competent body of the doctoral student self-government, may lay down specific requirements concerning the materials that a doctoral student is required to submit with the IPB report.

4. The Director, after consulting the competent doctoral student selfgovernment body, shall announce the date, place and method for the submission of materials, including reports, questionnaires and opinions, together with specimens thereof.

§ 27

1. After reviewing the report and its appendices, the mid-term evaluation committee shall interview the doctoral student, covering the topics presented in the report.

2. The committee shall inform the doctoral student of the date and place of the interview at least seven days in advance. In justified cases, the interview date may be changed at the request of the doctoral student.

3. The committee may invite the doctoral student’s supervisor, supervisors or assistant supervisor to take part in the interview.

4. The committee shall keep minutes of the interview with the doctoral student.